News

Study suggests mammography results in ‘widespread overdiagnosis’

View on the News

Discuss overdiagnosis, uncertainty with patients

The findings of Mr. Harding and his associates could have several causes and cannot be attributed unequivocally to overdiagnosis alone. But they do add to a growing body of literature on overdiagnosis.

Most scientists agree that there is some level of overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening, but the frequency has not been established conclusively. For clinicians, this means that we must learn to communicate with our patients about uncertainty and the limits of our scientific knowledge. We all need to become comfortable with informing women that we do not know the actual magnitude of overdiagnosis with precision.

Dr. Joann G. Elmore is affiliated with the department of medicine at the University of Washington, Seattle, and the department of epidemiology at the University’s School of Public Health. Ruth Etzioni, Ph.D., is affiliated with the division of public health sciences at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle. Dr. Elmore is also a medical editor for the nonprofit Informed Medical Decisions Foundation. The authors reported having no other relevant financial disclosures. This commentary is drawn from the accompanying editorial (JAMA Intern. Med. 2015 July 6 [doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.3056]).


 

FROM JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE

References

In regions where more women undergo screening mammography, the detection of small cancers increases but mortality doesn’t change significantly, compared with regions where fewer women have the screening, according to a report published July 6 in JAMA Internal Medicine.

The finding indicates that screening mammography leads to “widespread overdiagnosis,” identifying many small, indolent, or regressive breast tumors that otherwise would not have become clinically apparent, reported Charles Harding, a data scientist and statistical analyst in Seattle, and his associates.

Ideally, screening mammography should result in increased detection of small (less advanced) cancers, decreased detection of large (more advanced) cancers, and reduced breast cancer–specific mortality. To examine whether this is what actually happens, Mr. Harding and his colleagues analyzed mammography rates among 16,120,349 women over age 40 residing in 547 counties across the country during a 1-year period, where the frequency of screening ranged from 39% to 78%.

Courtesy Rhoda Baer/National Cancer Institute (NCI)

They correlated these findings with breast cancer incidence and mortality data in those regions for the ensuing 10 years. They identified 53,207 incident cases of breast cancer for their primary analysis.

There was a clear correlation between the number of users of screening mammography and breast cancer incidence. A 10% increase in screening was associated with a 16% mean increase in breast cancer incidence (relative risk, 1.16), or an absolute increase of 35-49 cases per 100,000. However, there was no significant change in breast cancer mortality (RR, 1.01).

When the data were stratified according to tumor size, the researchers found that the increase in breast cancer was confined to small tumors only (2 cm or less).

Moreover, “although it has been hoped that screening would allow breast-conserving surgical procedures to replace more extensive mastectomies, we saw no evidence supporting this change,” the investigators wrote (JAMA Intern. Med. 2015 July 6 [doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.3043]).

Future research should focus on whether all women undergoing screening mammography have the same risk of overdiagnosis, or if overdiagnosis is more likely to occur in certain groups, Mr. Harding and his associates added.

Mr. Harding reported receiving funding from Exergen Corporation for this work. Another study author, Francesco Pompei, Ph.D., is founder and chief executive officer of Exergen. Exergen is a designer and manufacturer of medical and other devices. No other financial disclosures were reported.

Recommended Reading

ASCO: Precision medicine initiatives take wing
MDedge ObGyn
Three bisphosphonates found on par in early breast cancer
MDedge ObGyn
Advanced breast cancer: paclitaxel bests nab-paclitaxel, ixabepilone
MDedge ObGyn
ASCO: Adjuvant denosumab halves fracture risk for breast cancer patients on AIs
MDedge ObGyn
Obesity boosts postmenopausal breast cancer risk
MDedge ObGyn
VIDEO: Consider cost in anastrozole vs. tamoxifen for DCIS
MDedge ObGyn
Insurance, location, income drive breast cancer surgery choices
MDedge ObGyn
Based on interval cancer rates, which women with dense breasts are most likely to benefit from supplemental imaging?
MDedge ObGyn
Atypical hyperplasia of the breast: Cancer risk-reduction strategies
MDedge ObGyn
Does adjuvant oophorectomy improve survival in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers with breast cancer?
MDedge ObGyn