| Lateral Epicondylitis: “But I Don’t Play Tennis”
Lateral Epicondylitis: “But I Don’t Play Tennis”
Denise Gardner Hite, DNP, CRNP
Treatment for this common overuse syndrome
is generally conservative, with patient compliance essential for a desirable
outcome. New approaches may be appropriate for some patients—whether or not
they play tennis.
Lateral epicondylitis (LE), or tennis elbow, is an
overuse syndrome that primary care providers commonly see. For affected
patients, LE can represent an extensive problem, as noncompliance with simple
conservative therapies commonly prolongs this condition. For most patients,
surgical intervention is considered a last resort.
In patients who develop LE, repetitive wrist
dorsiflexion with supination and pronation causes overuse of the extensor
tendons of the forearm, resulting in subsequent microtears, collagen
degeneration, and angiofibroblastic proliferation.1
LE affects men and women equally. It occurs in 1%
to 3% of the population but primarily in those ages 40 and older who perform
relevant repetitive motion. Considerable improvement or complete resolution of
LE symptoms can be achieved with conservative treatment, although six to 24
months’ continuation of such a regimen may be required. Apparent remission of
symptoms can be interrupted by recurrences.1
Once a diagnosis of tennis elbow is made,
the patient’s response may be, “But I don’t play tennis.”
Patient Presentation and History
Patients with LE usually present
with a history of several weeks’ elbow pain of an insidious onset, followed by
worsening rather than improvement. Most patients deny any history of direct
elbow trauma, although pain can be secondary to an acute event.2
The most commonly reported symptom is increased
pain with overhand lifting and point tenderness over the lateral epicondyle or
just distal to this area. Frequently patients report weakness or decreased
grip strength.
The diagnosis of LE is based on the history and
physical exam and may be supported by x-ray findings. Diagnosis may be
prefaced by a routine patient history regarding onset of symptoms, aggravating
or alleviating factors, hand dominance, occupation, and recreational
activities. A more pressing history of recent repetitive motion activities,
such as raking leaves, painting, or keyboard use, may illuminate the cause of
symptoms.
The clinician should inquire about the
effectiveness of any home self-treatments, such as NSAIDs or other pain
medication, orthotics (ie, a brace or strap), or other supportive measures. An
atypical presentation (eg, elbow pain just distal to or below the lateral
epicondyle) might suggest a more complex diagnosis, such as radial tunnel
syndrome. Such a case may warrant a more comprehensive exam; referral to an
orthopedic specialist would be suggested. A differential diagnosis for LE is
shown in the table2,3 below.

Physical Examination
A detailed history will usually
direct the physical exam, enhancing its basic principles, and provide a
preliminary diagnosis. The examining clinician should begin by observing for
any noticeable deformity. Subtle or obvious swelling can be present over the
lateral epicondyle, with localized erythema. Elbow joint effusion may indicate
intra-articular disease.4
In the assessment for elbow range of motion, 0°
(full extension) to 140° of flexion, and 50° of pronation (palm down) and
supination (palm up) is required. Instability is checked with the patient’s
arm fully extended. The examiner grasps the elbow with both hands and gently
applies medial, then lateral pressure, observing for any ligament laxity.
Palpation of the bones should begin over the
medial epicondyle and progress to the olecranon, then to the lateral
epicondyle. Direct palpation over the lateral epicondyle increases the
pressure over the origin of the extensor musculotendinous
structures—specifically, the extensor carpi radialis brevis and extensor
digitorum tendons. This pressure generally reproduces the pain associated with
LE.
The most revealing diagnostic test in the physical
exam is resisted extension of a dorsiflexed clenched fist on the affected side
(see the figure, below). Other physical tests for assessing this pain are with
resisted extension of the long finger and resisted supination of the affected
extremity. These maneuvers will elicit distinct pain at the lateral epicondyle
and guarding. Neurovascular status should be assessed distally.

A brief exam of the shoulder and wrist on the
affected side is suggested for completeness and to rule out other etiologies,
particularly in the event of a fall or other traumatic injury.
Radiographic Imaging
Plain film x-rays are obtained to
rule out fracture, tumor, or degenerative changes. There is no clear evidence
in the literature that plain film x-rays are helpful with the initial
diagnosis, and repeat x-rays at subsequent visits are not required when no
further trauma has occurred. In cases of extreme LE refractory to conservative
treatment, further evaluation with MRI is required.5
Treatment
Treatment for LE is generally
conservative. The use of NSAIDs, rest, ice, and a tennis elbow strap (ie, a
nonarticular proximal forearm strap or brace) are considered first-line
treatment options.1 The purpose of a tennis elbow strap is to
relieve pressure over the lateral epicondyle by increasing pressure over the
forearm muscles. Correct application of the strap is essential to alleviate
pain.
Before turning to surgical intervention (of which
a number of options exist for patients whose pain does not respond to
conservative treatment6), the clinician may consider use of
corticosteroid injections, which are relatively safe and usually have a
short-term effect (ie, two to six weeks). Injection therapy for LE is usually
considered appropriate for patients with chronic pain and disability that is
not relieved by more conservative means, or who experience acute pain with
functional impairment.7 Before performing corticosteroid
soft-tissue injections, clinicians should consult the appropriate governing
agency regarding this advanced practice privilege.
Patients who comply with orthotics and NSAID use
and are able to avoid repetitive motion are most likely to see an enduring
resolution of symptoms when steroid injections are administered as adjunct
therapy. A review of the literature suggests no significant benefit from
physical therapy or ultrasonography.8-10
Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections
Local
injection of platelet-rich plasma is an alternative based on the understanding
that platelets contain growth factors which aid in healing. This has been
demonstrated as an effective treatment for LE.11,12 Whole blood
obtained from the patient is centrifuged, with platelet-rich plasma then
collected for local injection over the lateral epicondyle.
The cost of platelet-rich plasma therapy averages
between $300 and $400 per injection (C. Whitney, personal communication, July
14, 2009). According to Mishra et al,12 one injection is ordinarily
sufficient.
Patient Education
In-depth
education prepares patients for long-term management of LE. Discussion
explaining the causes, pathology, duration, and treatment may lead to better
self-management for this chronic condition. Exacerbations are easily provoked
by return to repetitive activities or direct trauma.
Clinicians who care for patients with LE are urged
to emphasize the importance of complying with conservative therapies, avoiding
repetitive activities, and adhering to ongoing conservative treatment
measures. Follow-up is recommended six weeks after these treatment measures
are begun; they should be continued if the patient’s symptoms are improving.
Otherwise, further follow-up or referral to an orthopedic specialist can be
made at the clinician’s discretion.
Conclusion
Lateral epicondylitis is a common
elbow problem that can be diagnosed without difficulty, easily aggravated, and
annoying for patients. Noncompliance with recommendations to use orthotics,
avoid repetitive activities, and adhere to prescribed medication regimens is
the most likely explanation for lack of improvement.
Whether or not your patient plays tennis,
appropriate education and compliance with the agreed-on treatment support the
optimal outcomes for this vexing condition. The ball is in their court.
References
1. Johnson GW, Cadwallader K,
Scheffel SB, Epperly TD. Treatment of lateral epicondylitis. Am Fam
Physician. 2007;76(6):843-848.
2. Murphy KP, Guiliani JR, Freedman BA. Management
of lateral epicondylitis in the athlete. Operative Techniques Sports Med.
2006;14(2):67-74.
3. Kaminsky SB, Baker CL Jr. Lateral epicondylitis
of the elbow. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2003;7(4):179-189.
4. Boyer MI, Hastings H 2nd. Lateral tennis elbow:
“Is there any science out there?” J Shoulder Elbow Surg.
1999;8(5):481-491.
5. Pfahler M, Jessel C, Steinborn M, Refior HJ.
Magnetic resonance imaging in lateral epicondylitis of the elbow. Arch
Orthop Trauma Surg. 1998;118(3):121-125.
6. Lo MY, Safran MR. Surgical treatment of lateral
epicondylitis: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res.
2007;463:98-106.
7. Cardone DA, Tallia AF. Diagnostic and
therapeutic injection of the elbow region. Am Fam Physician.
2002;66(11):2097-2100.
8. Smidt N, Assendelft WJ, Arola H, et al.
Effectiveness of physiotherapy for lateral epicondylitis: a systematic review. Ann
Med. 2003;35(1):51-62.
9. Struijs PA, Kerkhoffs GM, Assendelft WJ, Van
Dijk CN. Conservative treatment of lateral epicondylitis: brace versus
physical therapy or a combination of both: a randomized clinical trial. Am
J Sports Med. 2004;32(2):462-469.
10. D’Vaz AP, Ostor AJ, Speed CA, et al. Pulsed
low-intensity ultrasound therapy for chronic lateral epicondylitis: a
randomized controlled trial. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2006;45(5):566-570.
11. Sampson S, Gerhardt M, Mandelbaum B. Platelet
rich plasma injection grafts for musculoskeletal injuries: a review. Curr
Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2008;1(3-4):165-174.
12. Mishra A, Pavelko T. Treatment of chronic
elbow tendinosis with buffered platelet-rich plasma. Am J Sports Med.
2006;34(11):1774-1778.
Vol. No: 20:1Issue:
1/15/2010
|